I’ve always been intrigued by the dramaturg - a role often spoken about with reverence, yet frustratingly vague in definition. While its value is acknowledged, the lack of clarity around what a dramaturg actually does means it is frequently misunderstood, underutilised, and treated as a luxury rather than a necessity.
Although I’d lightly engaged with the position of a dramaturg in past projects, I’d never had the chance to explore it deeply in any sustained or structured way. Like many directors, I’ve always considered dramaturgy central to my own process, which left me wondering: if directors and others already "do dramaturgy", is a separate role necessary?
But as I learned more about the role’s history and its established function in some parts of the world, my curiosity deepened, particularly around how a dramaturg's perspective, working methods, and questions differ from those of a director. And what it might feel like to consciously step into that role alone.
However, it’s the classic paradox: without experience, it’s hard to get work; and without work, it’s hard to gain experience. That’s why Centre 42’s Dramaturgs In Practice programme was so valuable. Its structure - a blend of workshops, peer dialogue, mentoring, and two industry placements - offered space to observe, explore, and test ideas in real-world contexts, within a safe and supportive setting.
My first placement was with Wild Rice on Dive, and my second with ITI on No Particular Order. Each provided different insights into how the dramaturg’s role might shift depending on the project’s needs, the timing of involvement, and the team’s structure.
With Dive, I joined late in the process as a "first audience", and my role was primarily observational. While I provided detailed feedback, the production was already well underway, and the space for dramaturgical exchange was limited. In contrast, at ITI, I joined early and worked alongside the director from the start - contributing dramaturgical inquiry to support the script analysis, early development and rehearsal process.
Alongside the DIP, I’ve been studying for an MA in Arts and Cultural Leadership. Doing both in tandem was intentional and has enriched my thinking about the industry as a whole - offering a creative counterbalance to strategic thinking and structural theory. And I firmly believe that the dramaturgy provides a compelling framework for how we make theatre, lead teams, and shape our cultural institutions.
A dramaturg, trusted and empowered, has the potential to ensure theatre’s relevance. It understands the need for history, context, timing, and impact - the "why here?" and "why now?" It comes from a place of curiosity and brings critical enquiry, asking good questions and supporting process. It notices patterns and connects dots – not just within the creative work, but from initial concept and rehearsal room to the audience and beyond. It is a collaborator, facilitator, and observer - close enough to be invested, yet with the distance to strategically and deeply reflect.
I’m very grateful to Centre 42 for championing a role that too often remains invisible. I leave the programme with a clearer understanding of what I can offer as a dramaturg, and a renewed ambition about what the role offers.